Skip to content

MCP Permissions

Use permissions to keep AI publishing workflows safe across teams, workspaces, and social channels.

Security6 minLevel: Intermediate

Overview

MCP permissions define what an AI assistant can do for a user or workspace.

In social publishing, permissions should distinguish viewing analytics, creating drafts, scheduling, approving, publishing, and deleting content.

Why This Matters

MCP matters because it turns AI from a writing surface into an execution surface. Instead of stopping at generation, AI tools can trigger real product actions through a structured layer that respects permissions, workflows, and business logic.

Preflight Checklist

  • Define the workflow you want the AI tool to trigger.
  • Map each action to an existing Postly capability.
  • Keep permissions and workspace routing inside Postly.
  • Default to draft-first behavior when actions could be risky.
  • Log and validate every AI-initiated action.

Step-by-Step Playbook

  1. Identify the user.
  2. Load workspace roles.
  3. Check channel access.
  4. Check action-level permission.
  5. Return an allowed or denied response.
MCP lets AI tools call real product actions instead of stopping at content generation.

Implementation Tips

  • Use least privilege.
  • Separate draft, schedule, approve, publish, and delete permissions.
  • Make permission errors clear to the AI user.

Example MCP Action Pattern

Reusable flow for “MCP Permissions

  • Intent: user asks the AI to perform a real workflow.
  • Tool call: AI selects a defined MCP action.
  • Validation: auth, workspace, and role checks run first.
  • Execution: Postly backend performs the requested action.
  • Result: structured output returns to the AI client.

Design Checklist

  • Map tools directly to product primitives.
  • Use one shared backend action layer across channels.
  • Support both MCP and API packaging where needed.
  • Keep AI-triggered actions reversible where possible.
  • Bias toward draft-first execution for content workflows.

Postly Workflow

In Postly, MCP should expose the product’s existing capabilities rather than invent a new execution system. That means drafts, scheduling, approvals, calendars, accounts, and analytics can be made available across AI-native and integration surfaces while Postly stays the source of truth for execution.

Postly remains the control layer while AI becomes the trigger or creation surface.

Metrics to Watch

  • Tool usage: which MCP actions get used most often.
  • Workflow completion: how often AI-generated intent becomes a completed action.
  • Approval rate: how many AI-triggered drafts move through review successfully.
  • Time saved: whether AI-triggered flows reduce execution time.
  • Error rate: how often auth, validation, or workflow failures occur.

Troubleshooting Common Issues

  • Too much logic in MCP: move business logic back into Postly services.
  • Unsafe actions: default to drafts and approvals instead of direct publishing.
  • Permission mismatches: enforce workspace and role checks before execution.
  • Generic tool design: define clearer, narrower action schemas.

Related Guides

Frequently Asked Questions

How should MCP permissions work for social media?
They should mirror the publishing platform’s existing workspace roles and action-level permissions.

Next Steps

Start by exposing one high-value Postly workflow through MCP, then validate how often users complete that flow from an AI surface. From there, expand into adjacent actions like approvals, scheduling, queue checks, and analytics.